home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: gordon_k@efn.org (Boinky Dude)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs.psychedelics
- Subject: San Pedro Dosage Discussion
- Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 07:41:54 -0800
- Message-ID: <gordon_k-0407950741540001@dynip07.efn.org>
-
- Hello! A friend and I have been working on this for a few weeks now. Hope
- it helps to clarify things!
-
- --Gordon
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- San Pedro Dosage Discussion
-
- S: San Pedro is *highly* variable. compared to a 1% (dried) peyote it
- has been measured anywhere from 2.4X stronger to 1/10th as strong. see
- the potency FAQ for a discussion:
- http://hyperreal.com/drugs/faqs/FAQ-San-Pedro
-
- G: How strong do you think the San Pedro's YOU'VE run into are?
- What's your personal sense of the average?
-
- S: well, as i said in the potency FAQ, 400g (fresh) of any i've tried
- have been an entheogenic "all-day lollipop".
-
- G: lessee...28g/ox x 16 =448g=1 pound. This makes our experiences
- vastly different. The most recent time, we weighed out 2-3 pounds
- fresh for two of us. It was slightly over 2 feet of a cactus that once
- was huge in diameter, but due to my growing conditions for the past
- year, was much narrower on the top end. Ended up being about 4 or 5
- 16oz glasses each. Yuck.
-
- And it wasn't that strong. approx equiv to about 2g shrooms. I've had
- somewhat stronger trips in the past on similar quantities.
-
- S: i've only tried cuttings from two different growers. as a cactus
- collector i've got far more strains than i'll ever try... i grow 'em
- for looks and am trying to get reliable flowering in pots (latest
- theory is that they must be at least 3' tall before they will flower.
- we'll see.) in fact, i've never eaten any *i've* grown, although i've
- rooted out and planted many cuttings i'd had other plans for. i kinda
- don't want to cut into them to get more statistics. i'm curious as to
- whether the kind of care i give them makes them stronger or weaker,
- but... they're my babies!
-
- G: I've only eaten ones I've grown. Usually I find them at really
- mainstream home/garden/hardware stores (grin). So, I have several very
- different specimens. And about 40 sprouts which will be ready in a few
- years(thanks otj!).
-
- S: that's pretty responsible, actually. i figure that those are from
- growers who aren't going to cut deeply into their mother-stock. no
- chance of eating the only surviving example from the collection of a
- retired bolivian botanist who, etc., etc., &c.
-
- G: It just amazes me that I can find them in such mainstream, public
- places. I've seen them mostly unlabeled. A couple times labeled "San
- Pedro" and a couple times recently as "cleistocactus". The
- "cleistocactus"' were all much fatter and bigger than my other San
- Pedros. They were also much lighter green. I haven't had them long
- enough to see if the new growth will be dark green like my other ones.
- It's just a little weird seeing these pretty different sorts of cactii
- labeled cleistocactus, and looking pretty different than my other
- SP's. But I did some research on cleistocactus, and couldn't find any
- descriptions that sounded like San Pedro, so they've just got to be a
- variety of T. pachanoi. Have you ever seen a fat, too light colored
- San Pedro labeled cleistocactus?
-
- S: i haven't come across any. a quick look thru backeberg turns up
- some light-green, small-spined, columnar cleistocacti, so i'd be really
- wary of yours... they might *really be* cleistocacti. still, i've seen
- some very pale San Pedro... difference in culture is one thing that
- comes to mind. but i'd be cautious... some of the tricho's were only
- placed in that genus when someone got them to bloom... at night! if
- they'd bloomed during the day they'd be helianthocereus... as long as
- they had a "hairy perianth", too. it *is* easy to mistake non-trichos
- for trichos.
-
- to return to the question "how strong were my cuttings", if i'd ever
- had a professionally calibrated dose of mescaline i might try the
- exercise of guessing how strong they were, but i haven't and won't. 12
- oz (340 g) was a fair "museum dose", and well over threshold. markedly
- entheogenic.
-
- G: I've never had a "professionally calibrated dose of mescaline"
- either. I'd agree that 12oz would be ok in public.
-
- S: at 16 oz (450 g) i wouldn't want to try to keep it together in
- public... episodes of "mind-melting", as i believe you said, began to
- occur during the peak. i'm not ready to try 24 oz.
-
- G: I've not had experiences on San Pedro that (yet) qualify as
- "mind-melting". I've taken over 16oz fresh before and still not been
- there...(but tripped pretty hard).
-
- S: if you want to guess that my descriptions sound like 340 mg and 450
- mg experiences, then you could guess that these stocks were 0.1 percent
- fresh or ~ 1.5 percent dried... but that *would* be stronger than some
- peyote. still well within the range of published potencies, though.
-
- G: My experiences all have been less strong than an equivalent weight
- of peyote should have been (total conjecture based on lots of
- reading).
-
- S: i've heard a couple of reports on alt.drugs from people who boiled
- a pound or so and had no effect. that makes sense; the *weakest* SP's
- reported in the scientific literature would require you to eat 5 or 6
- lbs to get a minimum dose. so the weak ones *are* out there for sale,
- somewhere.
-
- my guess is that most cuttings for sale fall around the mid-point, but
- there is still considerable variability.
-
- G: Yep. I've always gotten an effect from a pound or so, but on a
- couple occasions it was disappointing.
-
- S: these days i am using a centrifugal juicer (sanyo), so there is no
- chance of thermal degradation. also, there are no solids to buffer
- absorbtion. but i think that the base stock is probably the difference
- between our experiences.
-
- G: a couple juicer questions:
-
- 1) what weight do you usually juice up?
-
- 2) do you attempt to extract any mescaline from the squeezed pulp?
-
- 3)What results does your chosen dosage/weight get you?
-
- S: usually only a pound at a time. the screen on mine needs to be
- scraped clean of cuticle fragments about that often. and i only juice
- up as much as i am going to use near-term.
-
- i'll usually toss a mild sol'n of citric acid dissolved in 6-8 oz water
- into the marc in a blender jar & puree it. then i spoon that slush
- back into the juicer for a final extraction. i've eaten the remaining
- pulp (and once a methanol extraction of the final marc from ~ 1kg) with
- little-or-no effect & estimate that approx 98% of the available juice
- has been rinsed out of the pulp by my process.
-
- G: I know that some just boil it all day, and then concentrate it to a
- cup or two. My opinion on that is that it degrades the quality of the
- trip, hence my further experiments with the fresh juice.
-
- S: well, as a cook i object to treating any food-stuff in such a
- beastly way, and as a *californian* cook i incline towards treatments
- (esp. raw) that highlight the unique character of the food... hence
- *my* juice experiments. even tho a friend of mine is a well-known
- "boiler". :-)
-
- i will digress to say that variability of dosage is a general issue
- with all natural products, not just SP; that's why i worked thru the
- exercise for the peyote question. i'm not lecturing at *you*, gordon,
- this is something of a Frequently Asked Question on this alt.drugs.
- this pertains to 'shrooms, brugmansia, etc.:
-
- G: But variability in dosage seems particularily wide in San Pedro.
- Much more so than in say Psilocybe cubensis. 2g of P. cubensis will
- usually affect you in a predictable way. 2# San Pedro is much more
- unpredictable.
-
- S: yes, i think so. i've seen papers in, err... psychedelic review?
- t. lyttle, ed.? that said that psilocybin production was greatly
- influenced by available N in substrate. and claims are made about, say
- amazonian P. cubensis being 3X or 5X floridan, etc. and i raised some
- completely inactive ps. cyanescens on ground corn-cob and alfalfa
- pellets. but still, the SP variance is strikingly large.
-
- with an unknown stock it is prudent to "nibble up". what's the worst
- that could happen? well, you might take more than the maximum safe
- dose. WRT mescaline, we have ott's figure of 1000 mg. ok, let's not
- do that. so let's ask ourselves how much of the *strongest possible*
- SP it would take to get 1000 mg of mescaline, and let's not take more
- than that much of any untried SP. threshold dose is 150mg, so you know
- you need to take *at least* that much to have any effect at all with an
- unknown SP. or peyote.
-
- G: So, unless you are using cuttings or growing from seed (so you
- would always know what strain you were taking), one runs the
- possibility of never having a strong enough trip because of the
- possibility of overdose. If you don't know your strain and take
- cautious doses, then it might take a _really_ long time before you have
- fully satisfactory trips. Obviously this has been my experience. I've
- had two trips that were quite strong, but I still would have liked to
- go further. Both were on about 1-1.5feet of 3" dia. cactus.
-
- S: yes, i think so. i would *really* like some means of quant. assay
- using only a small sample. spectrophotometry only takes a couple of
- grams, but i don't have a spectrophotometer! and growing from seeds
- would only be stable given self-fertile seed. any crosses, hybrids,
- etc. might be variable.
-
- even with cuttings, there is some thought that cuttings taken in
- spring, grown in shade, various magic :-P cause variance in potency. i
- think that a large stock plant grown under constant conditions is the
- best bet. that's pretty much what i've had... i found a guy who was
- thinning out a pachanoi *thicket* in his back yard to make room for a
- greenhouse and got a *large* amount of material grown in constant
- conditions. :-) mostly rooted out, now.
-
- WRT the strongest SP on record, you would not want to take more than
- about 1 1/2 lbs. but this means that you can confidently take 1 1/2
- lbs of *any* known SP w/o overdose. and you need to take a minimum of
- ~ 4oz of this SP to have any effect, so don't waste your time with any
- less than this of *any* SP.
-
- then you need to define what "oops" means: "oops, sweet jeezus i'm
- 'one toke over the line' at thanksgiving dinner with grandma", or
- "oops, this is a boring party and i'm baseline." then you decide what
- your first cut is going to be. it's not as if the FDA or USDA is
- guaranteeing quality for you, and you're just trying to make up your
- mind what dosage is appropriate in your set and setting. based on that
- initial experience(s), adjust dose for next time.
-
- G: Except that you can't adjust your dose for next time if next time
- involves an unknown San Pedro. I have no way of knowing if the SP I
- just brought home is strong or weak. And with the rate of growth and
- re-sprouting it could take years to accurately determine
- characteristics.
-
- S: yup. that's what i think, too.
-
- of course, if you buy 8-10 4'-6' cuttings all at once, you'll have a
- chance to calibrate *that batch*... barring changes of potency as they
- sit in your garage, absorb fluorescent light, metabolize M to grow
- roots, transpire away water & become more concentrated, etc., etc.
-
- G: So what's your preferred dosage, fresh or dried?
-
- S: 340-450 g (fresh) of the ones i've tried. when i dried samples,
- they were ~94% water (YMMV). so... arghh, i'm on decaf today, can't
- easily do this in my head... 22-30g, dried?
-
- G: I've read internet reports that 25g dried didn't do much at all.
-
- .... Based on Ott's Pharmacotheon, I think an appropriate dose would
- be 100g dried, which is approximately 2 feet.
-
- S: beware of footage; i've got a mature SP stem, grown unirrigated in
- the shade, that is barely over 1" dia. my prize specimens are ~ 4"
- dia. as the bakers say, "half pies are square", so 2 feet of the
- latter would be ~16 times as heavy as the former, *per foot*. beware,
- beware.
-
- G: I know, hence my conversation with you about _weight_. I too have
- some skinny ones. All the more reason to dry and weigh rather than use
- the common "foot" terminology.
-
- S: or weigh it while fresh. but we are agreed that weight, not length
- is the metric. also, i have enormous respect for ott, but there are
- some inaccuracies WRT SP in the pharmacotheon.
-
- G: What inaccuracies did you find? And if SP is this variable, how
- does he feel about publishing mescaline content that is sure to be
- inaccurate for some people?
-
- S: Pharmacotheon fails WRT SP in these regards: no recognition of the
- variability, inaccurate description of the cuticle and sub-cuticle
- layer (he seemed to think that the cuticle was where the M is, but 15
- seconds with a cutting and a steak knife would change his opinion, i
- think). and he repeats the peruvianus UL. he gives
- pachanoi/peruvianus comparisons in terms of length, but mature
- peruvianus is easily 8", 2-3X as thick as pachanoi, etc. silly little
- stuff like that.
-
- i don't think he realizes how variable it is. i heard him speak, he is
- something of an unabashed indole-ring bigot, probably figures others
- have got the phenethylamines covered & feels no need to double-check
- their figures. he propagated fungus cultivation techniques and
- ayahuasca analogues, really signal work for a single individual... i'll
- cut him a little slack!
-
- i think your 100g dried would come to ~1.5 kg fresh. if you got the
- strongest SP measured that's about a 2X overdose. better pray you got
- sold the weak stuff! =:-O *odds are* you'll be ok, but no
- guarantees.
-
- G: Well, this conversation is fortuitious. Later this month I have
- scheduled (I'm a busy guy, I have to schedule my trips) a SP trip. Was
- going to use 95g dried and powdered. Now you've made me wonder. These
- SP's were mail ordered from Texas, so strain is totally unknown.
-
- My choices look like:
-
- 1) assume caution to be the best course (I had an extremely unpleasant
- experience a few years ago that taught me about caution), and take 50g
- dried.
-
- 2) go with my personal experience based on about 6-7 SP trips and munch
- the whole thing.
-
- What would YOU do? option 1 will probably produce a mild but enjoyable
- and not satisfactory trip. Option 1 guarantees no overdose.
-
- option 2 seems more likely to produce a proper strength trip, but the
- possibility of overdose, while extremely unlikely in my experience, is
- still there.
-
- sigh.
-
- S: ask a power-animal? 1/2 :-) and then cross-check as follows:
-
- (rounding your 95g to 100g 'coz i'm still drinking decaf): if we chow
- the whole thing we are saying, in effect "gawd, hope this's < 1
- percent" (0.01 * 100g == 1000mg). if it's 1 percent, then 150 mg M
- dose is 15 g of powder. (i forget the mg/kg ratios, but ott says 150
- mg is threshold, AFAIR... don't know if you're a big guy or little guy,
- but will use 150 mg). so i'd take 15 g the first day, if i didn't get
- buzzed at all i'd take 85 g the next day, reasoning that it is less
- than 1 percent and i can take the whole thing w/o OD, yet still 85
- percent of the "whole experience".
-
- if i got buzzed on 15 g i'd have to guess... :-)
-
- another approach:
-
- if "max safe" is ~7X "threshold" you can safely follow any
- "ineffective" dose with 7X increase. so take 95g/8 == 11.87 g to see
- if (7/8)*95g == 83.12 g is reasonable.
-
- you could take the small dose & large dose on successive days. if the
- small dose does not buzz you, then tachyphylaxis (sp?) won't keep you
- from a strong trip the next day. of course, if it *does* buzz you, you
- don't want to try to trip hard the next day anyway. in that case wait
- a day and take "somewhat" less than the whole "large dose".
-
- G: I only do this a couple times a year, so it's very important to me
- to get all this figured out. It's a drag to be fully prepared for it
- and not have it happen properly. And with the next trip months away.
- Yet, that's still better than an overdose.
-
- I have just got to grow a bunch of the same kind for the next 20 years
- so I can have the luxury of being able to accurately calibrate doses.
- AAARRRGGGHHH!!
-
- S: yep, that sounds like a what a "long term alliance" would involve.
- if you find a more-palatable alternative to "chunky-snot tea" please
- email me the recipe!
-
- G: I haven't yet, that's why I'm trying dried, powdered, capsuled this
- time. I just don't want to drink any more of that stuff! Also, my
- stomach capacity seems to be part of the limiting trip strength
- factor.
-
- To summarize: Guestimating dosage of San Pedro is extremely hard to do
- because the mescaline content can vary widely. Ideally, one would have
- a bunch of a particular strain/batch and after several trips, be able
- to more accurately estimate dosage(based on fresh or dried weight).
-
- If one has an San Pedro of unknown potency, one should start with small
- amounts and work up.
-
- Unfortunately, if you only do this once or twice a year, this process
- could take forever!
-
- S: not really forever. you want to nibble up across a 24:1 possible
- range. if you stride (increase dosages) 1:7 you can do this, i.e. zero
- in on any particular dosage in 1 1/2 strides (2 1/2 sessions). ;-)
-
- let's be conservative and span the *minimum* dose of the *strongest*
- and the *maximum* dose of the *weakest*: 4 oz => 1 3/4 lbs => (*urp*)
- 11 lbs are the first two strides. then, since (*hurl!*) 37 lbs is the
- *maximum* safe dose of the *weakest* on record, you only have 1/2
- stride still to go... 8-P (*buick!*) quit when you've had enough!
-
- so, if your unknown SP turned out to be the weakest SP known to science
- you could work up to a *maximum* dose in *at most* four sessions on
- successive days, w/o ever overdosing or ruining a trip by tachyphylaxis
- caused by the previous day's dose! aren't you *happy*, gordon? you've
- calibrated this *a lot* faster than "forever"!!! :-) :-) ;-) just set
- aside four days for your trip and you can nibble-up to a guaranteed
- total mind-melter without risking an OD!
-
- just be sure you buy no less than 50 lbs of uniform SP at a time. ;-)
-
- personally, i'll bet you trip your ass off on either day 2 or 3. :-)
-
- let's be agressive dare-devils instead: if i were going to *seek* the
- mind-melter, i'd start with 1 3/4 lbs (maximum safe dose if i lucked
- out and got the strongest). if i got any kind of a trip at all, i'd
- rest on day 2 to defeat tachyphylaxis and make my judgement call as to
- whether and how-much i'd do on day 3. *at most* this would be 24X, so
- this strategy takes only 40lbs! guaranteed mind-melter in only 2
- sessions with only the risk brought about by that pesky judgement
- call. don't do this at grandma's, tho! (well, maybe at *your*
- grandma's).
-
- G: One pound (fresh) seems to be a good starting point for most San
- Pedros, but more than a pound is ultimately desirable after beginning
- estimates on mescaline content have been established.
-
- S: for most *likely* San Pedros, and *absolutely* needed for "maximum
- safe dose" of any SP known to science. i think that about 1/2 MSD is a
- pretty strong trip from all published reports, so i *personally*
- wouldn't take more than 3/4-1 lb. of any unknown SP.
-
- G: So basically, we're all doomed to milder trips, unless we take the
- risk of ingesting a large amount of a potentially quite potent San
- Pedro.
-
- But I've never heard of anyone "overdosing" on San Pedro. Nontheless,
- there are San Pedro's on record that do have much higher mescaline
- contents than most.
-
- Sigh.
-
-
-